Skip to main content

Full text of "The Saugus Iron Works at Lynn, Mass. : addresses at the presentation to the city of Lynn of the first casting made in America"

See other formats


r^ 


ciV9  UH^^  \3  .Si. 


^ 


^oy>(X 


T. 


V.\we'\Ml\qi\\  \uU\c. V.\V>Aa.v^ 


3^ 


Bo&ton   Public   Library 

Do  not  write  in  this  book  or  mark  it  with  pen  or 
pencil.      Penalties    for    so    doing    are    imposed    by    the 
Revised  Laws  of  the  Commonwealth  of  Massachusetts. 

This  book   teas  issued  to   the  borrower    on  the  date 
last    stamped   below. 

\ 

- 

^ 

FORM   NO.    609:   l,3.A9:  ZOOM 


THE  S  AUG  US  IRON  WORKS 


AT 


LYNN.     MASS 


ADDRESSES 

At  the  Presentation  to  the   City  of  Lynn  of  the 
First  Casting  Made  in  America. 

BY  — 

C.  J.  H.  WOODBURY,  of  Lynn. 

JOHN  E.  HUDSON,  of  Boston. 

ACCEPTANCE  BY 

Hon.  ELIHU    B.    HAYES,    Ma.yor  of  Lynn. 

Novemher  21,  1892. 


L  Y  N  N  ,    M  A  S  S  .  : 

Pkkss     of     Thus.     P.     Nichols, 

1892. 


-1.^^" 


THE  SAUGUS  IRON  WORKS 


AT 


LYNN,     MASS 


ADDRESSES 

At  the  Presentation  to  the   Gily  of  Lynn  of  the 
First  Casting  Made  in  America. 

BY  — 

C.  J.  H.  WOODBURY,  of  Lynn. 

JOHN  E.  HUDSON,  of  Boston. 

ACCEPTANCE  BY 

Hon.  ELIHU   B.    HAYES,   Ma.yor  of  Lynn. 
November  21,  1892. 


LYNN,    M  A  S  S  .  : 

Press    of    Thos.     P.     Nichols, 

1892 


•^GST( 


C^^su^l   2» 


V-Cv/l<..wi.,ViXa^    (/!<xu^-ic^    (ljJo\^- 


"ivu^  «^    f^^P 


^ 


^^^c 


L!S/?^^^ 


^.^)^ 


a- 


THE  SAUGUS  IRON  WORKS  AT  LYNN. 


Address  by  C.  J.   H.  WOODBURY,  of  Lynn. 


Mr.  Mayor  : 

A  few  months  ago  I  learned  that  Messrs.  Arthur  and 
Llewellyn  Lewis,  the  owners  of  the  kettle  well  known  as  being 
the  first  casting  made  at  the  Saugus  Iron  Works,  were  seriously 
considering  the  acceptance  of  one  of  several  offers  recently  made 
for  its  purchase  ;  and  as  it  appeared  to  me  that  this  article,  which 
was  the  precursor  of  the  vast  iron  industry  in  America,  should 
be  kept  at  Lynn,  where  it  properly  belonged  as  a  relic  most 
closely  affiliated  with  the  early  history  of  our  town,  I  at  once 
purchased  the  kettle. 

Some  of  the  citizens  to  whom  the  facts  were  submitted  at  a 
later  day  joined  in  the  expenses  involved  in  the  purchase  and 
mounting  of  the  kettle  in  a  suitable  case  for  its  presentation  to 
the  city  ;  but  before  the  whole  affair  was  consummated,  John  E. 
Hudson,  Esq.,  now  a  resident  of  Boston,  but  born  in  Lynn,  and 
for  many  years  a  resident  of  this  city,  claimed  the  privilege  of 
making  the  gift  to  his  birthplace. 

His  interest  in  the  matter  was  a  deep  one,  as  he  is  a  direct 
descendant  of  Thomas  Hudson,  the  owner  of  the  site  upon  which 
the  Saugus  Iron  Works  were  built,  and  his  request  was  conceded 
by  the  original  subscribers,  who  now  offer  the  case  in  which  the 
kettle  is  placed  for  safe  preservation. 

The  case  is  presented  by  Messrs.  Charles  H.  Aborn,  George 
E.  Barnard,  Hon.  Francis  W.  Breed,  Hon.  William  A.  Clark, 
Jr.,  Charles  A.  Coffin,  Alfred  Cross,  Benjamin  W.  Currier, 
B.  V.  French,  William  G.  S.  Keene,  Patrick  Lennox,  John  T. 
Moulton,    William  H.  Niles,  E.  Wilbur  Rice,  Jr.,  Joseph  N. 


(4) 

Smith,  Benjamin  F.  Spinney,  Henry  B.  Sprague,  JosejDh  F. 
Swain,  David  H.  Sweetser,  Henry  F.  Tapley,  Charles  B. 
Tebbetts,  Prof.  Elihu  Thomson,  Col.  Roland  G.  Usher,  C.  J. 
H.  Woodbury,  John  P.  Woodbury  and  Mark  J.  Worthley. 

As  the  kettle  is  an  example  of  the  state  of  the  art  of  iron  found- 
ing in  1643,  so  the  tablet,  forming  the  rear  of  the  case,  is  also 
typical  of  the  skill  of  American  foundrymen  in  1893.  It  is  as  it 
came  from  the  mould  at  the  foundry  of  the  Magee  Furnace  Com- 
pany, at  Chelsea,  untouched  by  tools,  and  has  been  treated  by 
the  Bower-Barff  process,  converting  the  surface  into  the  mag- 
netic oxide  of  iron  to  prevent  corrosion. 

In  designing  this  tablet,  I  introduced  some  original  features, 
particularly  in  the  ground-work  of  the  face,  of  which  the  pattern 
was  woven  bamboo,  and  the  back  is  in  like  manner  an  impres- 
sion of  plaited  straw,  instead  of  the  tooled  surfaces,  which  are 
used  for  similar  tablets.  It  forms  the  back  of  a  glass  case,  in  the 
middle  of  which  the  kettle  is  hung  from  a  small  crane  project- 
ing diagonally  from  one  side  of  the  tablet. 

The  kettle  weighs  two  pounds  and  four  ounces,  and  holds 
nearly  a  quart. 

The  tablet  bears  the  following  inscription  : 

The  First  Casting  made 

IN  .America. 

Saugus  Ikon  Works 

1642. 

Presented  to  the  City  of  Lynn 

BY 

John  E.  Hudson, 
a  descendant  of 
Thomas  Hudson, 

THE   owner    of   the   SITE   OF   THE 

Iron  Works,  to  whom  the  first 

CASTING    was   given. 

This  case  presented  by 

CITIZENS  OF  Lynn. 

1892. 

It  may  be  very  naturally  asked  what  is  the  evidence  warranting 
the  presumption  that  this  kettle  is  as  claimed,  the  first  casting 
made  at  the  Saugus  Iron  Works. 


(5) 

It  is  true  that  this  article  lacks  the  stamp  and  attested  I'ecord  of 
many  witnesses,  but  like  Plymouth  Rock,  and  many  other  im- 
portant relics  of  American  history,  it  depends  in  part  upon  tradi- 
tion in  a  generation  devoid  of  sentiment  or  personal  interest, 
which  might  introduce  possible  elements  of  error. 

Tradition  has  preserved  for  the  world  much  of  its  history, 
essential  principles  of  law,  and  even  vital  points  in  both  Jewish 
and  Christian  religion. 

The  design  of  the  kettle  is  that  of  a  type  used  in  the  earliest 
colonial  days,  but  in  its  physical  characteristics  it  bears  evidence 
of  being  made  of  iron  cast  directly  from  the  ore  as  reduced  in 
a  blast  furnace,  and  not  from  pig  iron  remelted  in  a  reverba- 
tory  or  a  cupola  furnace  ;  and  there  is  no  evidence  or  reason  to 
believe  that  there  was  either  of  these  furnaces  at  the  Saugus  Iron 
Works. 

Thomas  Hudson  owned  sixty  acres  of  land  on  the  westerly 
bank  of  the  Saugus  River,  at  the  present  sites  of  Scott's  and  of 
Pranker's  mills,  and  he  sold  this  land  to  the  Companv  of  Under- 
takers for  the  Iron  Works.  He  claimed  in  consideration  the  first 
article  made  at  the  works,  and  although  not  given  to  idealisms, 
this  kettle  was  kept  by  him  and  his  descendants  in  the  male  line 
for  over  a  century,  when  it  passed  in  the  fourth  generation  to 
Mary  (Hudson)  Lewis,  who  gave  it  to  her  daughter,  Mary 
Lewis,  and  she  in  turn  gave  it  to  her  nephews,  Arthur  and 
Llewellyn  Lewis,  from  whom  the  purchase  was  made. 

These  two  brothers  well  remember  the  story  of  the  kettle  as 
told  by  their  grandmother,  who  prized  this  kettle  as  an  heir- 
loom, whose  history  had,  in  a  like  manner,  been  related  to  her 
by  her  grandparents. 

The  first  published  record  of  this  kettle  is  contained  under  date 
of  1642,  in  the  History  of  Lynn,  by  Alonzo  Lewis,  1S44,  P-  ^^2. 
The  same  is  included  in  Lewis'  and  Newhall's  History  of  Lynn 
(1890),  page  208,  and  is  referred  to  in  every  history  treating  of 
the  Saugus  Iron  Works.  The  Standard  History  of  Essex  County, 
C.  F.  Jewett  (1S7S),  of  which  the  chapters  upon  Lynn  were 
prepared  by  the  late. Cyrus  Mason  Tracy,  contains  (page  246)  a 
description  of  this  kettle  ;  and  I  have  in  my  ppssesiion  a  manu- 
script written  by  Mr,  Tracy  in  1881,  in  which  that  able  antiquary 


(6) 

eloquently   referred  to  it   as  "  the  humble   prototype  of  the  im- 
mense iron  industry  that  now  extends  over  our  land." 

Further  references  on  this  subject  may  be  made  to  Vol.  I,  page 
408,  of  the  History  of  Essex  County,  Massachusetts  (J.  W. 
Lewis,  Philadelphia,  188S),  in  which  the  chapters  on  Saugus 
were  written  by  Wilbur  F.  Newhall,  Esq. 

The  Saugus  Iron  Works  were  such  an  important  factor  in  the 
inception  and  early  development  of  American  industries  that 
their  early  history  merits  due  consideration.  This  was  not  the 
first  attempt  at  iron  smelting,  but  the  first  success. 

The  expectancy  for  mineral  wealth  was  universal  among  the 
early  explorers  of  America.  Every  royal  charter,  patent,  grant 
or  commission  contained  exact  provisions  for  the  division  of 
precious  and  base  metals,  in  which  the  privy  purse  was  to  share 
largely.  The  avaricious  Spaniards  expected  gold,  and  abased 
Columbus  because  he  had  not  found  it  in  fabulous  plenty.  The 
later  Spanish  explorers  pillaged  enough  gold  in  Mexico  and 
Peru  to  trample  out  the  Aztec  civilization,  and  in  turn  ruin 
themselves. 

The  outline  of  the  western  Atlantic  littoral  had  not  been  fully 
established  before  Spanish  romancers  pictured  the  unknown 
lands  with  strange  peoples,  who  submissively  yielded  to  the  con- 
querors, and  bestowed  upon  them  a  plethora  of  precious  metals. 

The  thrifty  English  were  not  blind  to  the  attraction  of  mineral 
wealth,  and  sought  the  less  alluring  but  more  valuable  iron,  al- 
though that  metal  was  unknown  to  the  Indians,  save  in  a  few 
instances  recently  discovered  by  Prof.  F.  W.  Putnam,  where  the 
mound-builders  fashioned  meteoric  iron  into  ornaments  or  irn- 
plements.  (Report  of  the  Trustees  of  the  Peabody  Museum, 
Cambridge,  Vol.  III.,  pages  172,  202,  407,  425). 

The  earliest  reference  to  iron  ore  in  America  is  contained  in 
the  History  of  the  Second  Expedition  to  Virginia,  by  Thomas 
Harriot,  in  1586,  wherein  he  says  in  reference  to  Roanoke 
Island:  "Wee  founde  neere  the  water  side  the  ground  to  be 
rockie  which  by  the  trial  of  a  mineral  man  was  founde  to  hold, 
iron  richly.  It  is  found  in  manie  places  of  the  country  else." 
The  hostility  of  the  natives  was  so  intense  that  the  Colonists  soon 
returned  to  England  without  developing  the  mines. 


(7) 

The  Jamestown  Colony  mined  and  sent  iron  ore  to  England 
as  early  as  i6oS  (VV.  F.  Durfee,  American  Industries  Since  Col- 
umbus, page  146).  In  1623,  they  built  iron  works  at  Falling 
Creek,  a  tributary  of  the  James  River,  about  seventy-six  miles 
from  Jamestown,  for  the  purpose  of  reducing  bog  iron  ore. 
The  works  had  approached  completion,  when  the  Indians  at- 
tacked the  settlement,  killing  three  hundred  and  fifty  persons  and 
burning  the  buildings,  March  33,  1633.  Thus  the  enterprise,  for 
which  skilled  men  had  been  especially  sent  to  the  Jamestown 
Colony  from  England,  was  abandoned.  (History  of  the  Iron 
Manufacture  in  all  Ages,  page  104,  James  M.  Swank,  Philadel- 
phia, 1893.) 

The  Massachusetts  Bay  Company,  at  a  meeting  in  London, 
March  3,  163S,  considered  the  advisability  of  sending  Malbon  to 
New  England  to  prospect  for  iron  ore,  and  he  was  at  Salem  in 
1629,  but  it  is  not  known  that  he  ever  reported  any  discoveries. 

The  bog  iron  deposits  in  the  upper  Saugus  meadows  were 
discovered  by  Thomas  Dexter,  one  of  the  Colonists,  and  he  in- 
formed his  fellow-townsman.  Captain  Robert  Bridges,  who  went 
to  London  and  formed  the  Company  of  the  Undertakers  for  the 
Iron  Works,  which  was  started  under  the  management  of  these 
two  men,  with  Joseph  Jenks,  one  of  the  best  workmen  of  the 
day,  as  master  mechanic. 

Captain  Robert  Bridges  was  one  of  the  leading  men  of  the 
settlement,  having  been  entrusted  with  diplomatic  offices  on  the 
part  of  the  Colony  of  Massachusetts  Bay,  and  of  whom  it  was 
said  by  Nathan  M.  Hawkes,  "No  man  who  lacked  suavity  and 
winning  social  manners  could  have  persuaded  calculating  London 
merchants  to  have  ventured  their  dearly  loved  funds  in  an  iron 
works  experiment  across  the  Atlantic  in  a  savage  and  unknown 
land."     (Magazine  of  American  History,  Vol.  XXV,  page  150.) 

The  site  of  the  iron  works  was  well  selected,  being  situated  at 
the  head  of  navigation,  by  the  ford  in  the  highway  from  Boston 
to  Salem,  at  a  water-power,  and  near  to  the  bog  iron  ore  depos- 
its, whose  exact  location  is  unknown,  save  that  they  were  in 
Adam  Hawkes'  meadows.  The  whole  iron  works  tract  probably 
covered  three  thousand  acres  ;  all  of  which  was  situated  in  that 
portion  of  the  town  of  Lynn  known  by    its    original  name  of 


(8) 

Saugus,  which  it  resumed  as  a  legal  matter  when  it  was  set  off 
from  Lynn  in  1815.  The  whole  territory  now  including  Lynn 
and  its  five  surrounding  towns,  was  at  the  first  called  Saugus, 
but  the  name  was  changed  to  Lynn  by  act  of  the  General  Court, 
November  15,  1637,  yet  various  portions,  as  Saugus,  Swamp- 
scott,  and  Nahant,  always  retained  these  local  names. 

The  General  Court  granted  them  at  various  times  immunity 
from  import  or  export  duties,  and  from  taxation,  and  other  priv- 
ileges. I  believe  that  the  act  of  October  14,  1645,  is  the  earliest 
instance  of  legislation  upon  the  principles  of  protection  to  man- 
ufacturers, which  has  been  such  an  important  feature  in  the  de- 
velopment of  American  industries.  The  act  is  a  long  document, 
but  the  following  extracts  are  of  especial  interest. 

"5.  *  *  They  shall  have  free  liberty  to  transport  the  same 
(their  iron)  by  shipping  to  other  parts  or  places  of  the  world, 
and  to  make  sale  thereof.  *  *  *  Provided  they  sell  it  not  to 
any  person  or  state  in  actual  hostility  with  us. 

"7.  It  is  also  granted  that  the  undertakers  and  adventurers, 
together  with  their  agents,  servants,  and  assigns,  shall  be  and  are 
hereby  free  from  taxes,  assessments,  contributions  and  other 
public  charges  whatsoever,  for  so  much  of  their  stock  and  goods 
as  may  be  employed  in  and  about  the  said  Iron  Works,  for  and 
during  the  period  of  twenty-one  years  yet  to  come  from  the 
date  of  these  presents." 

There  is  not  any  detailed  description  of  the  works  and  the 
exact  methods  employed,  but  there  is  much  light  thrown  upon 
these  matters  in  the  voluminous  records  of  continual  legislation 
and  litigation,  which  took  place  during  the  forty-six  years  that  the 
works  were  in  operation. 

The  works  contained  a  blast  furnace,  in  which  bog  iron  ore 
was  reduced  by  means  of  charcoal,  using  as  a  flux  lime,  which 
in  the  earliest  days  of  the  works  was  obtained  from  the  oyster 
shells,  which  then  abounded  on  the  coast  of  Massachusetts  Bay. 
Cannon  were  also  melted  at  this  foundry,  far  in  advance  of  the 
time  when  swords  were  to  be  beaten  into  plough-shares,  or 
spears  into  pruning-hooks. 

The  iron  from  the  blast  furnace  was  run  into  straight  trenches 
in    the    sand,  and    thereby  cast  into   long   triangular  bars  called 


(9) 

"  sowe  iron,"  which  were  converted  into  wrought  iron  and  steel. 
Castings  were  made  directly  from  the  metal  flowing  from  the 
blast  furnace  into  a  pool,  whence  it  was  dipped  by  crucibles  and 
poured  into  the  moulds.  The  cupola  furnace  was  not  invented 
until  1790. 

The  manufacture  of  wrought  iron  and  steel  must  have  been 
entered  upon  contemporaneously  with  that  of  cast  iron,  as  John 
Endicott,  of  Salem,  the  first  Governor  of  Massachusetts  Bay, 
wrote  to  Governor  John  Winthrop,  at  Boston,  December  i,  1642  : 
"  I  wish  to  hear  much  of  your  son's  iron  and  steel;"  the  son 
being  John  Winthrop,  Jr.,  who  was  interested  in  the  Saugus 
Iron  Works. 

The  wrought  iron  and  steel  were  made  in  a  blomary,  which 
may  be  described  as  a  charcoal  fire  four  feet  thick  in  a  black- 
smith's forge.  The  end  of  a  bar  of  sow  iron  was  plunged  into 
the  fire,  and  in  time  a  pasty  mass  of  wrought  iron  would  settle 
to  the  bottom.  Other  portions  of  the  bar  would  be  converted 
into  steel  when  the  process  stopped  at  the  intermediary  stage  be- 
tween cast  and  wrought  iron.  This  process  of  steel-making  is 
still  used  throughout  the  Oriental  nations,  and  also  in  the  moun- 
tainous region  south  of  the  Ohio  River. 

The  iron  works  also  included  a  machine  shop,  in  which  the 
first  fire  engines  made  in  America  were  built  for  the  Town  of 
Boston,  in  accordance  with  a  vote  of  the  town  meeting,  March 
I,  1654,  that  ''  The  select  (men)  have  power  and  liberty  to  agree 
with  Joseph  Jynks  for  Ingins  to  convey  water  in  case  of  fire,  if 
they  see  cause  so  to  do."  (Brayley,  History  Boston  Fire  De- 
partment, 18S9,  page  7.) 

Although  the  Iron  Works  were  in  operation  very  soon  after 
building  was  commenced,  yet  additions  were  made  during  a 
number  of  years.  In  1645,  an  order  of  the  General  Court  shows 
that  the  works  had  "  some  tons  of  sowe  iron  cast  and  some  others 
in  readiness  for  the  forge,"  and  letters  of  Governor  Winthrop  in 
August  and  September,  164S,  state  that  the  furnace  produced 
seven  to  eight  tons  per  week.  The  principal  product  was  bar 
iron  "as  good  as  the  Spanish,"  costing  £20  per  ton,  also  axes 
and  agricultural  implements. 

When  Governor  John  Endicott  began  the  Oak  Tree  and  Pine 


(10) 

Tree  coinage  in  1652,  the  dies  were  made  by  Joseph  Jenks  at  the 
Saugus  Iron  Works.  (Early  Coins  of  America,  S.  S.  Crosby, 
Boston,  1875,  p.  79.) 

It  is  stated  by  Judge  James  R.  Newhall  that  the  designs  were 
made  by  Elizabeth,  the  wife  of  Joseph  Jenks,  the  master 
mechanic.  (Liii,  18S0,  p.  78.)  This  coinage,  bearing  the  stamp 
"  Massachvsetts  State  "  without  any  reference  to  the  throne,  was 
probably  the  first  fundamental  act  of  inilependence  to  the  Mother 
Country.  The  colonists  were  driven  to  such  a  course  by  the 
lack  of  money,  as  exchanges  were  for  the  most  part  carried  on  in 
barter  with  bullets  and  wampum  serving  for  small  coin. 

Joseph  Jenks  also  invented  a  sawmill,  which  received  a  patent 
for  fourteen  years  from  the  General  Court  on  June  10,  1646,  being 
the  first  patent  granted  in  America,  and  also  a  water  engine  for 
mills,  which  was  undoubtedly  a  form  of  water  wheel  and  not  the 
hydraulic  engine  which  that  term  would  now  signify. 

He  also  invented  the  modern  American  scythe,  long  and  nar- 
row and  stiffened  by  a  ridge  along  the  back,  a  marked  improve- 
ment "for  the  more  speedie  cutting  of  grasse  "  over  the  broad 
short  bushwack  scythe  made  from  a  thin  plate  of  steel,  and  richly 
deserved  the  patent  for  seven  years  which  was  granted  by  the 
General  Court,  May  33,  1655. 

In  1667  he  petitioned  the  General  Court  relative  to  a  wire 
manufactory  ;  and  May  15,  1672,  his  petition  for  authority  to  coin 
money  was  refused. 

The  litigation  to  which  the  Iron  Works  were  subjected  in- 
creased and  became  oppressive.  It  appears  as  if  the  impulse  to 
"  sue  the  corporation  "  was  instinctive  among  the  townspeople. 
The  corporation,  its  managers,  and  its  workmen  were  proceeded 
against  under  every  conceivable  excuse.  The  boundaries  of 
worthless  land,  poor  crops  on  sterile  soil,  unrestrained  court- 
ships, speaking  lightly  of  the  Governor,  reproachfully  of  the 
Church  and  harshly  of  the  King,  were  all  subjects  of  long  con- 
tinued and  bitter  litigation. 

Land  was  sold  to  the  corporation  and  afterwards  further 
damages  claimed.  Dexter  brought  suit  because  the  alewives  did 
not  come  into  his  net  below  the  dam  as  of  yore  ;  and  Hawkes  sued 
because  the  water  rose  too  high  above  the  dam.     The  town  sued 


(11) 

the  corporation  for  pew  rents  in  a  meeting-house  several  miles 
distant,  and  notwithstanding  the  immunity  in  the  act  of  October 
14,  1645,  already  quoted  in  part,  won  the  case.  The  pews  could 
not  have  been  worn  much  for  the  courts  took  action  against  the 
managers  for  not  attending  public  worship. 

The  works  are  not  known  to  have  been  in  operation  after  168S, 
when  the  tract  had  din.inished  to  six  hundred  acres  and  passed 
into  individual  ownership.  If  the  supply  of  bog  iron  ore  had 
been  sufficient  for  the  works,  they  would  undoubtedly  have  been 
continued  the  same  as  other  enterprises  of  that  day  in  various 
parts  of  New  England. 

.  The  immediate  return  to  those  engaged  in  the  enterprise  is  now 
of  little  moment,  but  the  results  to  the  whole  Colony  of  an  estab- 
lishment which  attracted,  developed  and  then  scattered  a  body 
of  skilled  mechanics  were  of  great  importance  and  no  doubt  may 
have  been  an  essential  factor  in  rearing  many  prominent  industries. 

The  grass-covered  mounds  of  ashes  and  dross  along  the  banks 
of  the  Saugus  River  are  the  only  vestige  of  those  busy  works, 
and  serve  as  an  uninscribed  monument  to  the  mechanical  pio- 
neers of  America. 


ADDRESS 

By  JOHN   E.    HUDSON,   of   Boston. 


Mr.  Mayor  : 

Mr.  Woodbury  has  told  us  so  fully  the  history  of 
the  Iron  Works  at  Saugus,  the  evidences  of  the  genuineness  of 
this  kettle  as  the  first  casting  there  made,  and  the  circumstances 
which  have  brought  us  together,  that  there  is,  I  think,  nothing 
to  be  added  by  me  beyond  the  formal  act  of  transferring  the  title 
to  the  city. 

As  to  my  part  in  the  matter,  perhaps  I  may  say  that  I  was 
engaged  in  some  inquiries  into  matters  relating  to  Thomas  Hud- 
son, and  in  the  course  of  them  was  on  the  track  of  this  kettle 
and  endeavoring  to  buy  it — my  ofler,  I  do  n't  doubt,  was  one  of 
the  offers  to  which  Mr.  Woodbury  refers — and  in  this  way  I  came 
to  know  what  Mr.  Woodbury  and  his  associates  had  in  hand.  I 
need  not  say  that  I  appreciate  the  courtesy  shown  in  yielding  to 
my  suggestion  that  there  was  a  certain  fitness  in  the  gift  coming 
from  a  descendant  of  the  original  owner,  and  in  allowing  me  to 
pay  for  and  present  the  kettle  to  the  city. 

It  remains,  then,  only  to  sum  up  and  say  that  the  relic  is  one 
which  should  be  preserved  ;  that  it  must  be  unique  in  its  kind  as 
the  first  fruits  of  an  industry  which  has  grown  to  such  vast  pro- 
portions, and  that  its  proper  resting  place  is  in  the  City  Hall  of 
the  town  within  the  borders  of  which  the  works  were  established 
and  the  casting  was  made  ;  and  trusting  that  your  Honor  agrees 
with  me  in  these  views,  I  beg  to  offer  the  kettle  to  the  city  for  its 
acceptance. 

If  one  might  express  a  hope,  it  would  be  that  the  city's  accept- 
ance of  this  will  encourage  the  bringing  together  of  such  other 


(14) 

mementos  of  that  early  time  as  may  still  be  extant.  If  whatever 
there  is  of  this  kind  could  be  brought  into  view  ;  if  examples  of 
furniture  as  illustrative  of  the  habits  of  the  time  could  be  collect- 
ed ;  if  diaries,  if  such  exist,  could  see  the  light,  and  old  accounts 
and  old  papers  could  be  copied  ;  much,  I  think,  might  be  done 
towards  gathering  the  material  for  a  history  of  that  early  time 
before  it  should  be  altogether  lost.  The  city  would,  I  don't 
doubt,  furnish  a  proper  place  for  the  care  of  such  things.  Might 
it  be  hoped  that  the  city  would  see  its  way  to  printing  the  early 
volumes  of  records  which  still  remain.''  as  an  example  and  a 
stimulus  to  collecting,  before  it  is  too  late,  all  that  can  now  be 
collected  that  relates  to  the  early  settlement.  All  this  would  make 
a  proper  history  of  Lynn  possible,  and  she  should  have  a  better 
history  than  has  yet  appeared.  I  think  the  story  is  worth  telling 
in  a  better  way  than  it  has  ever  yet  been  told. 
I  beg  your  acceptance  of  the  kettle. 


Address  of  Acceptance, 

By    Hon.    ELIHU   B.    HAYES,    Mayor  of  Lynn. 


Gentlemen : 

It  is  well  to  pause  in  the  rush  and  strife  of  our 
busy  lives  to  consider  matters  like  these,  which  have  been  called  to 
our  attention  to-night,  and  reflect  upon  what  we  owe  to  the  sturdy 
men  who  planted  new  industries  and  a  new  form  of  government 
on  these  sterile  shores.  It  is  fitting,  too,  that  we  should  consider 
anew  the  starting  of  the  first  Iron  Industry  in  America  at  a  time 
when  we  are  about  to  open  the  largest  iron  foundry  in  New 
England  near  by  the  site  of  the  works  where  this  kettle  was 
cast.  I  have  been  much  interested  in  the  historical  facts  pre- 
sented by  Mr.  Woodbury.  These  facts  call  to  our  minds  in  a 
forcible  manner  the  debt  we  owe  to  those  sturdy  pioneers  whose 
descendants  we  are,  and  the  fruits  of  whose  industry  and  intelli- 
gence we  enjoy.  We  are  coming  more  and  more  to  realize  the 
debt  we  owe  them.  They  not  only  inaugurated  a  form  of  govern- 
ment which  enabled  us  to  grow  up  the  most  prosperous  people 
on  the  earth,  but  the  influence  of  the  idea  first  tested  by  them 
has  influenced,  elevated  and  humanized  every  government  under 
which  civilized  men  live. 

I  was  impressed  also  by  the  suggestion  of  Mr.  Hudson,  that 
it  is  well  to  preserve  such  relics  as  this  in  public  places,  that  the 
attention  of  the  young  people  just  coming  on  the  stage  of  action 
may  be  called  to  the  beginning  of  our  industries.  There  is  no 
better  work  that  can  be  done  in  a  public  way  than  to  furnish  the 
people  in  our  communities  with  steady  and  profitable  employ- 
ment.    As   these    early   people    have   worked    and   sacrificed  to 

< 

inaugurate  and  establish   industries,   so   should  we  use  our  best 


(10) 

endeavors  in  a  public  and  private  way  to  encourage  business,  to 
promote  industrial  organizations,  and  encourage  all  in  their  efforts 
to  furnish  profitable  employment. 

I  have  enjoyed  much  the  exercises  of  this  occasion,  and  for 
myself  and  for  the  people  of  the  city  I  thank  the  gentlemen  who 
have  by  their  efforts  and  generous  donations  preserved  this  relic 
of  the  industrial  past  for  the  encouragement  and  instruction  of 
this  and  coming  generations.  It  will  gain  an  added  interest  as 
time  goes  on. 


Boston  Public  Library 
Centnd  Library,  Copley  Square 

Division  of 
Reference  and  Research  Services 


The  Date  Due  Card  in  the  pocket  indi- 
cates the  date  on  or  before  which  this 
book  should  be  returned  to  the  Library. 

Please  do  not  remove  cards  from  this 
pocket. - 


\ 


BOSTON  PUBLIC  LIBRARY 


3  9999  05268  380  0